3 Mayıs 2017 Çarşamba

Global Warming Facts For Kids

Global Warming What is global warming? Global warming is the term used to describe the rising of the average temperature on Earth. It has to do with the overall climate of the Earth rather than the weather on any given day. History of Global Temperatures The Earth has gone through changes in temperature before. The Earth has even gone through several ice ages, when the temperature dropped significantly and a lot of the world was covered in ice glaciers. Each time the planet eventually warmed up and melted the ice. Why is global warming important? Even small variations of the planet's average temperature can have a large impact on the environment. For example, the ice ages that occurred generally involved a reduction in the global temperature of around 5°C. Here are few of the things that scientists think may happen as the temperature rises. Some of them are already happening: Glaciers melting - Many glaciers are already melting and shrinking throughout the world. If the temperature increases they will continue to melt. Ocean levels will rise - As the glaciers melt, the ocean levels will rise. This could cause flooding in cities located near the coast. Migration of animals - Animals will migrate to cooler spots as their old habitats get too warm. This could upset the food chain and put some species in danger of extinction. Extreme weather - Some scientists think that warming will fuel more powerful hurricanes as well as more droughts and flooding in different areas of the world. Change in ecosystems - cold weather biomes such as the tundra will shrink, while desserts will continue to expand. What causes global warming? Global warming is a very complex subject. Some scientists disagree as to what caused the rise in temperatures that occurred during the end of the 20th century. Things that can have an impact on global warming include the natural temperature fluctuations of the planet, greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, volcanic eruptions, and increased solar activity. Natural Fluctuations The average temperature of the Earth has changed throughout history. Some of this is due to natural changes in temperature that occur over time due to a large number of variables. Even slight changes in nutrient cycles such as the carbon cycle, the oxygen cycle, and the water cycle likely have an impact on the climate over time. Some scientists think that the current warming trend is just a part of the Earth's natural changes in temperature and it will eventually start to cool again. Greenhouse Gases The reason the Earth isn't a ball of frozen ice is because of greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gases act like insulation to keep the Earth warm. However, as more and more greenhouse gases get into the atmosphere, the Earth will start to grow warmer. The main greenhouse gases that keep the Earth warm are water vapor, carbon dioxide, and methane. In the past 100 years humans have been the cause of a significant increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, especially carbon dioxide. Every time we drive our cars or use electricity, more carbon dioxide is released into the air. Sun Activity Since all the energy and heat on the Earth comes from the sun, it follows that the sun's activity will have some effect on the temperature of the Earth. The activity of the sun is actually different over time, which can change how much energy actually hits the Earth. Volcanoes When volcanoes erupt they can change the temperature of the entire Earth for a short period of time. This is because their eruptions send large amounts of ash and particles into the atmosphere. This blocks some of the sun's rays from hitting the Earth and can cause the Earth to cool. At the same time, volcanic eruptions emit large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. What can we do about it? We can't do much about the Earth's natural fluctuations, volcanic eruptions, or the sun's activity, but we can impact the amount of greenhouse gases that are emitted into the air. Many of our everyday activities cause more carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere including driving cars and using electricity. You can help by trying to cut down on the amount of electricity you use as well as how much driving you (or your parents) do. Things like carpooling to events and planting trees can help. Carbon Footprint One way to measure how much carbon dioxide you contribute to the atmosphere is by calculating your carbon footprint. There are a lot of variables to consider including the gas mileage of your family's car and how your local power plant generates its electricity. A lot of the same activities that produce carbon dioxide also cause air pollution, so by lowering your carbon footprint you can help the environment in many ways. Facts About Global Warming It takes lots of data and many years to determine how the average temperature of the Earth is changing. Even then, many scientists disagree on how to interpret the data. Since 1990, worldwide carbon dioxide emissions have risen by over 20 percent. The United Nations formed a group called the International Panel on Climate Change to investigate global warming. One way to reduce carbon dioxide is to use clean renewable energy sources such as solar energy and wind energy. These sources produce much less pollution as well. Play Fun Miniclip Games in This Site. Online Brain y8 Games for Kids.

26 Ekim 2016 Çarşamba

2016 Climate Trends Continue to Break Records

2016 Climate Trends Continue to Break Records Two key climate change indicators -- global surface temperatures and Arctic sea ice extent -- have broken numerous records through the first half of 2016, according to NASA analyses of ground-based observations and satellite data. Each of the first six months of 2016 set a record as the warmest respective month globally in the modern temperature record, which dates to 1880, according to scientists at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. The six-month period from January to June was also the planet's warmest half-year on record, with an average temperature 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.4 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the late nineteenth century. Each of the first six months of 2016 set a record as the warmest respective month globally in the modern temperature record, which dates to 1880. Meanwhile, five of the first six months set records for the smallest monthly Arctic sea ice extent since consistent satellite records began in 1979. This video is public domain and can be downloaded from the Scientific Visualization Studio. Five of the first six months of 2016 also set records for the smallest respective monthly Arctic sea ice extent since consistent satellite records began in 1979, according to analyses developed by scientists at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, in Greenbelt, Maryland. The one exception, March, recorded the second smallest extent for that month. While these two key climate indicators have broken records in 2016, NASA scientists said it is more significant that global temperature and Arctic sea ice are continuing their decades-long trends of change. Both trends are ultimately driven by rising concentrations of heat-trapping carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The extent of Arctic sea ice at the peak of the summer melt season now typically covers 40 percent less area than it did in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Arctic sea ice extent in September, the seasonal low point in the annual cycle, has been declining at a rate of 13.4 percent per decade. overhead view of sea ice showing brown sediments Chunks of sea ice, melt ponds and open water are all seen in this image captured at an altitude of 1,500 feet by the NASA's Digital Mapping System instrument during an Operation IceBridge flight over the Chukchi Sea on Saturday, July 16, 2016. Credits: NASA/Goddard/Operation IceBridge "While the El Niño event in the tropical Pacific this winter gave a boost to global temperatures from October onwards, it is the underlying trend which is producing these record numbers," GISS Director Gavin Schmidt said. Previous El Niño events have driven temperatures to what were then record levels, such as in 1998. But in 2016, even as the effects of the recent El Niño taper off, global temperatures have risen well beyond those of 18 years ago because of the overall warming that has taken place in that time. graph showing upward trend The first six months of 2016 were the warmest six-month period in NASA's modern temperature record, which dates to 1880. Credits: NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies The global trend in rising temperatures is outpaced by the regional warming in the Arctic, said Walt Meier, a sea ice scientist at NASA Goddard. "It has been a record year so far for global temperatures, but the record high temperatures in the Arctic over the past six months have been even more extreme," Meier said. "This warmth as well as unusual weather patterns have led to the record low sea ice extents so far this year." NASA tracks temperature and sea ice as part of its effort to understand the Earth as a system and to understand how Earth is changing. In addition to maintaining 19 Earth-observing space missions, NASA also sends researchers around the globe to investigate different facets of the planet at closer range. Right now, NASA researchers are working across the Arctic to better understand both the processes driving increased sea ice melt and the impacts of rising temperatures on Arctic ecosystems. NASA's long-running Operation IceBridge campaign last week began a series of airborne measurements of melt ponds on the surface of the Arctic sea ice cap. Melt ponds are shallow pools of water that form as ice melts. Their darker surface can absorb more sunlight and accelerate the melting process. IceBridge is flying out of Barrow, Alaska, during sea ice melt season to capture melt pond observations at a scale never before achieved. Recent studies have found that the formation of melt ponds early in the summer is a good predictor of the yearly minimum sea ice extent in September. "No one has ever, from a remote sensing standpoint, mapped the large-scale depth of melt ponds on sea ice," said Nathan Kurtz, IceBridge’s project scientist and a sea ice researcher at NASA Goddard. "The information we’ll collect is going to show how much water is retained in melt ponds and what kind of topography is needed on the sea ice to constrain them, which will help improve melt pond models." Operation IceBridge is a NASA airborne mission that has been flying multiple campaigns at both poles each year since 2009, with a goal of maintaining critical continuity of observations of sea ice and the ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica. At the same time, NASA researchers began in earnest this year a nearly decade-long, multi-faceted field study of Arctic ecosystems in Alaska and Canada. The Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) will study how forests, permafrost and other ecosystems are responding to rising temperatures in the Arctic, where climate change is unfolding faster than anywhere else on the planet. ABoVE consists of dozens individual experiments that over years will study the region's changing forests, the cycle of carbon movement between the atmosphere and land, thawing permafrost, the relationship between fire and climate change, and more. *when you free time you can check it some of free miniclip games and y8 free web based games sites.

new glimpse of melting under Antarctic glaciers

NASA's Earth Science News Team A view from Operation IceBridge's aircraft of Crosson Ice Shelf, foreground. Mt. Murphy is in the background. Credit: NASA/OIB/Michael Studinger. A view from Operation IceBridge's aircraft of Crosson Ice Shelf, foreground. Mt. Murphy is in the background. Credit: NASA/OIB/Michael Studinger. Two new studies by researchers at NASA and the University of California, Irvine (UCI), detect the fastest ongoing rates of glacier retreat ever observed in West Antarctica and offer an unprecedented direct view of intense ice melting from the floating undersides of glaciers. The results highlight how the interaction between ocean conditions and the bedrock beneath a glacier can influence the glacier's evolution, with implications for understanding future ice loss from Antarctica and global sea level rise. The two studies examined three neighboring glaciers in West Antarctica that are melting and retreating at different rates. Smith, Pope and Kohler glaciers flow into the Dotson and Crosson ice shelves in the Amundsen Sea Embayment in West Antarctica, the part of the continent with the largest loss of ice mass. A study led by Bernd Scheuchl of UCI, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters on Aug. 28, used radar measurements from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-1 satellite and data from the earlier ERS-1 and ERS-2 satellites to look at changes in the glaciers' grounding lines — the boundary where a glacier loses contact with bedrock and begins to float on the ocean. The grounding line is important because nearly all glacier melting takes place on the underside of the glacier's floating portion, called the ice shelf. If a glacier loses mass from enhanced melting, it may start floating farther inland from its former grounding line, just as a boat stuck on a sandbar may be able to float again if a heavy cargo is removed. This is called grounding line retreat. Flow speeds of Pope, Smith and Kohler glaciers. Flow speeds of Pope, Smith and Kohler glaciers. Credit: NASA/EO. Scheuchl's team found a rapid retreat of Smith Glacier's grounding line of 1.24 miles (2 kilometers) per year since 1996. Pope retreated more slowly at 0.31 mile (0.5 kilometer) per year since 1996. Kohler, which had retreated at a slower pace, actually readvanced a total of 1.24 miles (2 kilometers) since 2011. These differences motivated Ala Khazendar of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California — a coauthor of Scheuchl's study — to measure the ice losses at the bottoms of the glaciers, which he suspected might be underlying the changes in their grounding lines. Khazendar’s study, published Oct. 25 in the journal Nature Communications, used measurements of changes in the thickness and height of the ice from radar and laser altimetry instruments flown by NASA's Operation IceBridge and earlier NASA airborne campaigns. Radar waves penetrate glaciers all the way to their base, allowing direct measurements of how the bottom profiles of the three glaciers at their grounding lines changed between 2002 and 2014. Laser signals reflect off the surface, so for the floating ice shelves, laser measurements of changes in surface elevation can be used to infer changes in ice thickness. Previous studies using other techniques estimated the average melting rates at the bottom of Dotson and Crosson ice shelves to be about 40 feet per year (12 meters per year). Khazendar and his team, using their direct radar measurements, found stunning rates of ice loss from the glaciers' undersides on the ocean sides of their grounding lines. The fastest-melting glacier, Smith, lost between 984 and 1,607 feet (300 and 490 meters) in thickness from 2002 to 2009 near its grounding line, or up to 230 feet per year (70 meters per year). Those years encompass a period when rapid increases in mass loss were observed around the Amundsen Sea region. The regional scale of the loss made scientists strongly suspect that an increase in the influx of ocean heat beneath the ice shelves must have taken place. "Our observations provide a crucial piece of evidence to support that suspicion, as they directly reveal the intensity of ice melting at the bottom of the glaciers during that period," Khazendar said. "If I had been using data from only one instrument, I wouldn’t have believed what I was looking at, because the thinning was so large,” Khazendar added. However, the two IceBridge instruments, which use different observational techniques, both measured the same rapid ice loss. Khazendar said Smith's fast retreat and thinning are likely related to the shape of the underlying bedrock over which it was retreating between 1996 and 2014, which sloped downward toward the continental interior, and oceanic conditions in the cavity beneath the glacier. As the grounding line retreated, warm and dense ocean water could reach the newly uncovered deeper parts of the cavity beneath the ice shelf, causing more melting. As a result, "More sections of the glacier become thinner and float, meaning that the grounding line continues retreating, and so on,” he said. The retreat of Smith might slow down as its grounding line has now reached bedrock that rises farther inland of the 2014 grounding line. Pope and Kohler, by contrast, are on bedrock that slopes upward toward the interior. The question remains whether other glaciers in West Antarctica will behave more like Smith Glacier or more like Pope and Kohler. Many glaciers in this sector of Antarctica are on beds that deepen farther inland, like Smith's. However, Khazendar and Scheuchl said researchers need more information on the shape of the bedrock and seafloor beneath the ice, as well as more data on ocean circulation and temperatures, to be able to better project how much ice these glaciers will contribute to the ocean in a changing climate. Scheuchl's study is titled "Grounding Line Retreat of Pope, Smith, and Kohler Glaciers, West Antarctica, Measured with Sentinel-1a Radar Interferometry Data." It was published in Geophysical Research Letters. Khazendar's paper, titled "Rapid Submarine Ice Melting in the Grounding Zones of Ice Shelves in West Antarctica," was published in Nature Communications. *when you free time you can check it some of free miniclip games and y8 free web based games sites.

18 Ağustos 2015 Salı

Global Warming CCAM March 2015

Global Warming CCAM March 2015

Global Warming CCAM March 2015

Today we are releasing results from our latest national survey, conducted in March 2015. Nearly two-thirds of the American public (63%) currently think global warming is happening, a percentage that has remained relatively stable over the past five years. Similarly, the percentage of the public who think that if global warming is happening, it is mostly human caused (52%) has also remained relatively unchanged.

One reason these numbers have been stable in recent years may be because most Americans are simply not hearing or talking about the issue. Our survey finds, for example, that only 40% of the American public says they hear about global warming in the media at least once a month and only 19% hear about it at least once a week. Further, only 16% say that they hear people they know talk about global warming at least once a month, with only 4% reporting they hear other people talking about it at least once a week.

However, the survey also finds that Americans trust a number of potential sources of information about global warming, including climate scientists (70% of the public trusts them for information), family and friends (67%), other kinds of scientists (64%), and TV weather reporters (60%). Half of Americans (50%) also trust Pope Francis as a source of information about global warming – which is potentially important given that the Pope is preparing a major statement (an encyclical) about the religious and moral dimensions of climate change (for more information, please see our recent report, Climate Change in the American Christian Mind).

This report, Climate Change in the American Mind: March 2015, includes an executive summary, and sections on Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes, risk perceptions, policy support, and moral and religious responses to the issue.

 0  3  299
 

online new friv games

Custom Search
Web
 
 
 

Action Games

All instructions are included in the gamernrnAutomatic saving ensures that all data will be kept even if the browser is closed.rnr..

During the rare event of an eclipse, our city is under attack.
Drive your tank into the darkness, and shoot down the wave..

Keys Needed

rn

Left, right, up, and down arrows-Controls the pizza delivery guy

rn

..

Control your creature from the top to the bottom of the sea while eating and growing larger and larger. The bigger you get, the..

Play Broke Down Pop Star DressUp Game
Play College Queen Dress Up Gamern
Three balls. Each one with a particular property. Glass ball, rubber ball and metal ball.
Use your mouse to control your paddle.
Arrow key to Move,R to Restart,Spacebar to Nextlevel.
Tankomania is a fun tank shooting game. Your mission
is to destroy the enemie's tank and their nuclear facilities.
Finis..
Play Princess Bride Dress Up Game
You are the rightful hand of law, order and life itself! As a police officer in this zombified world, your assignment is to get ri..
Take control of a German panzer division through the rise and fall of the German military machine.
An alien army is invading earth. Your job as a weapons engineer is to build a killroom to protect yourself.rnrnThis is a different..
Where is my coin is skill game that you must use your eyes to see 3 cups , after that click the cup that has a coin. It will faste..
Crazy robot wants to reach sky.It can't fly but it can jump through to sky.rnBe carefull of angry birds and don't forget to collec..
Take on the roll of a knight who has been invited to take part in the King's Tournament of Champions. You will have to fight your ..
O life is so hard.
All I want is enjoy fishing
But those worms are so 'tards.
They want the fruits of my labor,

free online y8 games

Custom Search
Web
 
 
 

Mini Games Games

turn cards over in this fun Christmas memory game! Make matches to clear the game board.
Phantom Imperial is a strategy game based upon on Phantom Kingdom tales. Jann is young-spirited king of Phantom Kingdom. The kingd..
A Crazy Doctor is conducting experiments with human brains. It's your Mind vs the Doctors Brain Experiment can you beat the brain ..
match 3 or more of the Sea Creatures in a Row, match more than 3 and earn a bonus!
The winter is coming, actually it's already here so why don't you try this new winter 3D racing game. Find yourself emerged in a f..
Donna seeks your help in cleaning the room in which they had a party last night. She needs the room clean up work to be completed ..
Press on the letters to create a word with at least 3 letters. Match the color of the first letter to protect the tower! Get the b..
Barbie is going on a city trip to Dubai. She will be staying in one the most luxurious hotels in the world, the Burj Al Arab. She ..
Use the mouse to piece together three pictures of Thermal Springs
Use the mouse to find the hidden numbers across ten desert Scenes
A motor cycle racing game set in the streets of Los Angeles. In this exciting street racing game, you will have to race at maximum..

Drive and drift your car to win the race.
Collect power-ups on the way.
Once you master the car handling,
that ..

Show your skill by dressing up this doll.
Jump as high as you can while being chased by a giant accelerating saw with your funny cube-like character. Also expect a lot of m..
Two marshmallow friends with different abilities are going into journey through the forest. Help them pass all levels, there are m..
Drag a box around to help Bob escape each level. Both Bob and the box must reach the exit because you have only one box.

16 Haziran 2015 Salı

Cleaner and Cheaper: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants

Cleaner and Cheaper: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants In the United States, electric power plants emit about 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year, or roughly 40 percent of the nation's total emissions. The EPA has both the authority and responsibility to reduce pollution from these plants under the Clean Air Act, the nation's bedrock air pollution law adopted in 1970. The EPA proposed carbon pollution standards for existing power plants in June, 2014. NRDC has proposed an effective, affordable and flexible approach to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants under the Clean Air Act that taps into the ingenuity of the states and the private sector. More from NRDC NRDC Summary of EPA's Clean Power Plan: Carbon Pollution Standards for Existing Power Plants power plant pollution Transforming the Power Grid with Clean Energy -- Reliably -- Every Day power grid reliability Recent Blog Posts from NRDC Experts State legislature season ends poorly for coal lobbyists (again) posted by Aliya Haq, 6/10/15 Clean Power Plan On Track: Court Dumps Bid to Block EPA from Curbing Power Plant Carbon Pollution posted by David Doniger, 6/9/15 Wind energy jobs on the rise as U.S. states chart a clean path to fight climate change posted by Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, 6/3/15 Author Dan Lashof Author Dan Lashof Publications New Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save American Households $13 Billion on Electric Bills, Create 274,000 Jobs Read More 2014 Issue Brief Update (PDF) portable document format Technical Appendices (.xlsx): I. Assumptions II. Reference Case III. Moderate Case Full EE IV. Moderate Case Constrained EE V. Ambitious Case Full EE VI. Ambitious Case Constrained EE VII. Ambitious Case Constrained EE PTC State Carbon Emissions Tool Transcript of NRDC Press Briefing, May, 28, 2014 (PDF) What Commentators Are Saying (PDF) portable document format Press Release: 2014 Analysis Audio recording of March 20, 2014 Power Plant Plan Update Press Conference Presentation: March 2014 Update (PDF) 2012 Issue Brief: Q&A on EPA's Legal Authority to Set "System Based" Carbon Pollution Standards for Existing Power Plants under Clean Air Act Section 111(d) (PDF) Issue Brief: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants (PDF) Report: Closing the Power Plant Carbon Pollution Loophole (PDF) 2012 Webcast of NRDC Carbon Cutting Plan Presentation: Strong Carbon Pollution Standards for Dirty Power Plants (PDF) A ground-breaking Natural Resources Defense Council proposal on how to cut carbon pollution from America's power plants can achieve even greater reductions than previously thought, and at less cost, an updated analysis of NRDC's initial 2012 plan shows. NRDC's new analysis finds that that 470 to 700 million tons of carbon pollution can be eliminated per year in 2020 compared to 2012 levels, equivalent to the emissions from 95 to 130 million autos. At the same time, the NRDC approach would yield $28 billion to $63 billion in health and environmental benefits that far outweigh the costs of putting first-ever limits on carbon pollution. By comparison, NRDC's 2012 analysis put those numbers at 270 million tons and $25-60 billion. The improved outcomes result from updating the 2012 approach to reflect recent trends in the electricity industry, including lower electricity demand than previously expected and reduced costs for wind turbines, and natural gas. Furthermore, the updated analysis demonstrates there are various paths, not just one, to achieve dramatic reductions in the carbon pollution power plants release through a range of solutions that rely, to varying degrees, on energy efficiency, wind energy, and carbon capture and storage. NRDC's original power plant carbon reduction proposal, released in December 2012, has been widely seen as a possible model for standards the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is developing as part of the Administration's National Climate Action Plan. Climate and energy experts at NRDC have shown that the nation can create jobs, grow the economy and curb climate change by going after the largest source of climate-changing pollution: emissions from hundreds of existing power plants. NRDC's proposal shows how the EPA, in partnership with the states, can set new carbon pollution standards under existing authority in the Clean Air Act that will cut existing power plant emissions 20 to 30 percent by 2020 (relative to 2012 emission levels). The approach includes an innovative provision that will drive investment in cost-effective energy efficiency, substantially lowering the cost of compliance, lowering electricity bills, and creating thousands of jobs across the country. Further, NRDC's updated analysis shows that the benefits -- in saved lives, reduced illnesses, and climate change avoided -- far outweigh the costs, by $21 billion to $53 billion in 2020. Having endured recent years where climate change contributed to damaging floods, widespread wildfires, record drought, and superstorm Sandy which cost Americans hundreds of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, we can't afford to wait any longer to act. For the health and welfare of Americans, for the nation's economy, and for the stability of the planet, now is the time to reduce pollution from America's power plants, dramatically increase the energy efficiency of our economy, and reduce the threat of climate change. We know where the pollution is; now we just have to go get it. In the United States, electric power plants emit about 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year, or roughly 40 percent of the nation's total emissions. The EPA has taken important first steps by setting standards that will cut the carbon pollution from automobiles and trucks nearly in half by 2025 and by proposing standards to limit the carbon pollution from new power plants. Now the EPA is working on tackling the CO2 pollution from hundreds of existing fossil-fueled power plants in the United States. The EPA has both the authority and responsibility to reduce pollution from these plants under the Clean Air Act, the nation's bedrock air pollution law adopted in 1970. NRDC has crafted an effective and flexible approach to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants that: uses the legal authority under the Clean Air Act. recognizes differences in the starting points among states. charts a path to affordable and effective emissions reductions by tapping into the ingenuity of the states. provides multiple compliance options, including cleaning up existing power plants, shifting power generation to plants with lower emissions or none at all, expanding renewables, and improving the efficiency of electricity use. Using the same sophisticated integrated planning model used by the industry and the EPA, NRDC calculated the pollution reductions that would result from the proposed approach -- and the costs and benefits of achieving those reductions. The updated analysis shows NRDC's approach would cut CO2 pollution from America's power plants by 21 to 31 percent from 2012 levels by 2020, and 25 to 36 percent by 2025. It would deliver benefits in saved lives and damages avoided from climate change that would surpass the cost by as much as $21 billion to $53 billion by 2020. For Americans' health and welfare, for the nation's economy, and for the health of the planet, we can't afford not to curb the carbon pollution from existing power plants.