16 Haziran 2015 Salı

Cleaner and Cheaper: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants

Cleaner and Cheaper: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants In the United States, electric power plants emit about 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year, or roughly 40 percent of the nation's total emissions. The EPA has both the authority and responsibility to reduce pollution from these plants under the Clean Air Act, the nation's bedrock air pollution law adopted in 1970. The EPA proposed carbon pollution standards for existing power plants in June, 2014. NRDC has proposed an effective, affordable and flexible approach to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants under the Clean Air Act that taps into the ingenuity of the states and the private sector. More from NRDC NRDC Summary of EPA's Clean Power Plan: Carbon Pollution Standards for Existing Power Plants power plant pollution Transforming the Power Grid with Clean Energy -- Reliably -- Every Day power grid reliability Recent Blog Posts from NRDC Experts State legislature season ends poorly for coal lobbyists (again) posted by Aliya Haq, 6/10/15 Clean Power Plan On Track: Court Dumps Bid to Block EPA from Curbing Power Plant Carbon Pollution posted by David Doniger, 6/9/15 Wind energy jobs on the rise as U.S. states chart a clean path to fight climate change posted by Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, 6/3/15 Author Dan Lashof Author Dan Lashof Publications New Carbon Pollution Standards Can Save American Households $13 Billion on Electric Bills, Create 274,000 Jobs Read More 2014 Issue Brief Update (PDF) portable document format Technical Appendices (.xlsx): I. Assumptions II. Reference Case III. Moderate Case Full EE IV. Moderate Case Constrained EE V. Ambitious Case Full EE VI. Ambitious Case Constrained EE VII. Ambitious Case Constrained EE PTC State Carbon Emissions Tool Transcript of NRDC Press Briefing, May, 28, 2014 (PDF) What Commentators Are Saying (PDF) portable document format Press Release: 2014 Analysis Audio recording of March 20, 2014 Power Plant Plan Update Press Conference Presentation: March 2014 Update (PDF) 2012 Issue Brief: Q&A on EPA's Legal Authority to Set "System Based" Carbon Pollution Standards for Existing Power Plants under Clean Air Act Section 111(d) (PDF) Issue Brief: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants (PDF) Report: Closing the Power Plant Carbon Pollution Loophole (PDF) 2012 Webcast of NRDC Carbon Cutting Plan Presentation: Strong Carbon Pollution Standards for Dirty Power Plants (PDF) A ground-breaking Natural Resources Defense Council proposal on how to cut carbon pollution from America's power plants can achieve even greater reductions than previously thought, and at less cost, an updated analysis of NRDC's initial 2012 plan shows. NRDC's new analysis finds that that 470 to 700 million tons of carbon pollution can be eliminated per year in 2020 compared to 2012 levels, equivalent to the emissions from 95 to 130 million autos. At the same time, the NRDC approach would yield $28 billion to $63 billion in health and environmental benefits that far outweigh the costs of putting first-ever limits on carbon pollution. By comparison, NRDC's 2012 analysis put those numbers at 270 million tons and $25-60 billion. The improved outcomes result from updating the 2012 approach to reflect recent trends in the electricity industry, including lower electricity demand than previously expected and reduced costs for wind turbines, and natural gas. Furthermore, the updated analysis demonstrates there are various paths, not just one, to achieve dramatic reductions in the carbon pollution power plants release through a range of solutions that rely, to varying degrees, on energy efficiency, wind energy, and carbon capture and storage. NRDC's original power plant carbon reduction proposal, released in December 2012, has been widely seen as a possible model for standards the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is developing as part of the Administration's National Climate Action Plan. Climate and energy experts at NRDC have shown that the nation can create jobs, grow the economy and curb climate change by going after the largest source of climate-changing pollution: emissions from hundreds of existing power plants. NRDC's proposal shows how the EPA, in partnership with the states, can set new carbon pollution standards under existing authority in the Clean Air Act that will cut existing power plant emissions 20 to 30 percent by 2020 (relative to 2012 emission levels). The approach includes an innovative provision that will drive investment in cost-effective energy efficiency, substantially lowering the cost of compliance, lowering electricity bills, and creating thousands of jobs across the country. Further, NRDC's updated analysis shows that the benefits -- in saved lives, reduced illnesses, and climate change avoided -- far outweigh the costs, by $21 billion to $53 billion in 2020. Having endured recent years where climate change contributed to damaging floods, widespread wildfires, record drought, and superstorm Sandy which cost Americans hundreds of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars, we can't afford to wait any longer to act. For the health and welfare of Americans, for the nation's economy, and for the stability of the planet, now is the time to reduce pollution from America's power plants, dramatically increase the energy efficiency of our economy, and reduce the threat of climate change. We know where the pollution is; now we just have to go get it. In the United States, electric power plants emit about 2.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) each year, or roughly 40 percent of the nation's total emissions. The EPA has taken important first steps by setting standards that will cut the carbon pollution from automobiles and trucks nearly in half by 2025 and by proposing standards to limit the carbon pollution from new power plants. Now the EPA is working on tackling the CO2 pollution from hundreds of existing fossil-fueled power plants in the United States. The EPA has both the authority and responsibility to reduce pollution from these plants under the Clean Air Act, the nation's bedrock air pollution law adopted in 1970. NRDC has crafted an effective and flexible approach to cut carbon pollution from existing power plants that: uses the legal authority under the Clean Air Act. recognizes differences in the starting points among states. charts a path to affordable and effective emissions reductions by tapping into the ingenuity of the states. provides multiple compliance options, including cleaning up existing power plants, shifting power generation to plants with lower emissions or none at all, expanding renewables, and improving the efficiency of electricity use. Using the same sophisticated integrated planning model used by the industry and the EPA, NRDC calculated the pollution reductions that would result from the proposed approach -- and the costs and benefits of achieving those reductions. The updated analysis shows NRDC's approach would cut CO2 pollution from America's power plants by 21 to 31 percent from 2012 levels by 2020, and 25 to 36 percent by 2025. It would deliver benefits in saved lives and damages avoided from climate change that would surpass the cost by as much as $21 billion to $53 billion by 2020. For Americans' health and welfare, for the nation's economy, and for the health of the planet, we can't afford not to curb the carbon pollution from existing power plants.

Extreme Weather: Impacts of Climate Change

Environmental Issues > Global Warming Main Page > All Global Warming Documents

When it comes to connecting the dots between climate change, extreme weather and health, the lines are clear.

The earth is saying something with record heat, drought, storms and fire. Scientists are telling us this is what global warming looks like.

It's time to listen – and take action. There's plenty we can do.

Carbon pollution is the main reason our planet is getting hotter, increasing the chances of weather disasters, drought and flood and hurting our health.

There are solutions. For starters, we can cut carbon pollution by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels and increasing our use of clean, renewable energy. And we can implement policies that help us prepare for flooding, drought, storms and other consequences of climate change.

But first, we need national leadership that will stop ignoring what the earth and scientists are telling us about climate change -- and instead start ignoring those who continue to deny it is happening.

last revised 1/15/2014

All Tags [ View Popular Tags ]:
AB 1493
AB 32
AB32
ACES
agriculture
air pollution
air quality
Alaska
algae
AliyaHaq
alternative fuels
Arctic
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
asthma
automakers
BeckyHammer
BenChou
biodiesel
biofuels
cabon
California
cap 2.0
cap and trade
carbon assessment
carbon capture and storage
carbon dioxide
carbon emissions
carbon footprint
carbon offsets
carbon pollution
carbon standard
caribou
cars
causes of global warming
CCS
Chile
china
Clean air
Clean Air Act
clean energy
clean energy economy
clean power plan
climate
Climate Action Plan
climate change
climate disruption
climate disruption tax
climate legislation
Climate Security Act
coal
coal plants
coal-fired power plants
coastal flooding
consequences
coral
cpp
CPS
DanLashof
dirty fuels
drilling
drought
earth day
economy
Elizabeth Kolbert
emissions
endangered species
endangered species protection
energy
energy efficiency
energy efficient buildings
energy policy
energy security
environmental protection agency
EPA
extreme weather
farming
fish & fishing
flooding
floods
florida
food
Forests
fuel
fuel efficiency standards
fuel savings
Gary Braasch
gas prices
global warming and health
global warming and the economy
global warming emissions
global warming emissions copenhagen accord
global warming legislation
global warming treaties
Great Lakes
Great Lakes National Parks
green buildings
green jobs
green sports
greenhouse gas
greenhouse gas emissions
greenhouse gas regulations
greenhouse gases
grizzly bear
growing green awards
habitat loss
Harmful Algal Blooms
health
health effects
health effects of pollution
health impacts
heat
heat wave
heat waves
holiday
hurricane
hurricane Irene
Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Sandy
hurricanes
hybrid
hybrid vehicles
India
India Initiative
infrastructure
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
International
international agreements
interviews
IPCC
JuanDecletBarreto
KellyHenderson
KimKnowlton
Kyoto protocol
LarryLevine
Latin America
LCFS
legislation
liquid coal
livestock
low-income
marine conservation
Massachussetts v EPA
McKinsey
melting ice and glaciers
Mexico
MiriamRotkin-Ellman
Montreal Protocol
mortality
mountain pine beetle
mountaintop removal mining
national parks
natural gas
new energy economy
nuclear energy
ocean acidification
ocean policy
ocean pollution
oceans
oil
oil shale
oil shale development
oil shale development in colorado river basin
oil shale impact on water
ozone
Peru
PeteAltman
photos
polar bears
polar ice cap
policy
power plants
public transportation
record-high temperatures
refrigerants
renewable energy
renewable energy/clean energy
renewables
respiratory illness
Rocky Mountains
salmon
Sandy
sb375
science
sea levels
sea-level rise
SeanAlcorn
seniors
ski
smart growth
smog air pollution
solar power
solutions
species protection
sprawl
StarlaYeh
storms
stormwater pollution
Supreme Court
sustainable communities
tar sands
tennessee
testimony
tourism
toxic waste
transportation
transportation bill
trout
U.S.
VEETC
vehicle emissions
vehicles
water
water conservation
water supply
water sustainability
weather
Western Arctic
what you can do
white bark pine
whitebark pine
Wilderness Preservation
wildfires
wildlife
winter sports
Yellowstone